Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) has long been regarded as a crucial tool in firefighting, particularly for combating flammable liquid fires. According to Grand View Research, the AFFF segment has dominated the global firefighting industry owing to its property of instant foam formation. 

In the event of fuel-based fires, AFFF covers the pool of hydrocarbon fuel with foam, creating a thermal barrier that allows combustion to be extinguished.

However, recent revelations about the toxicity of AFFF components, including per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), have sparked concerns about their impact on human health. Exposure to AFFF has been linked to severe health risks, including cancer.

In this article, we will explore the topic of AFFF exposure and its alarming links to cancer and other major health problems. We will also go over the legal landscape concerning the AFFF lawsuits.

The Composition and Function of AFFF 

AFFF is a fire suppressant that combines water with various chemical components to form foam. According to ConsumerNotice.org, this foam contains ethylene and propylene glycol to extend its effectiveness. The fire suppressant foam is supplied as a concentrated mixture combined with water. It is offered in formulations of either three percent or six percent, determined by the water content in the mixture.

When sprayed onto fires, AFFF cools the flames and creates a film that denies oxygen to the fuel, preventing re-ignition. The foam’s ability to cover a large area efficiently makes it particularly valuable in fire emergencies, ensuring swift and effective containment of disastrous situations.

PFAS: The Silent Threat 

The inclusion of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in AFFF’s formulation has raised the alarm due to their potential toxicity. PFAS, including PFOS and PFOA, are human-made compounds that do not naturally occur in the environment. 

Research has indicated that long-term exposure to these substances can lead to a variety of health issues, including cancer. PFAS persist in the environment for extended periods, further exacerbating their potential harm.

Health Risks and Studies

Studies on animals demonstrate the toxicity of PFAS, and there is growing evidence suggesting that PFAS leads to severe health problems such as cancer. According to a post by CDC, research suggests exposure to some PFAS might also result in immune system effects and increased cholesterol levels.

These chemicals accumulate in the body over time, increasing the risks of adverse health effects, especially for those with prolonged exposure. Research is ongoing to fully understand the mechanisms through which PFAS affect human health, shedding light on the urgency of addressing this issue comprehensively.

Litigation and Public Outcry

According to TorHoerman Law, the revelation of AFFF’s potential hazards has led to a surge in litigation against manufacturers like 3M. Firefighters, military personnel, and civilians exposed to AFFF have filed lawsuits claiming manufacturers failed to warn about the health risks. 

Thousands of pending lawsuits across the U.S. underscore the severity of the situation and the urgent need for accountability and compensation. This legal battle is not only about seeking justice for affected individuals but also about raising awareness and driving necessary changes in firefighting practices.

Recently, there has been a positive development pertaining to the firefighting foam lawsuits. According to a recent AFFF lawsuit update, 3M Company has made a significant announcement. A substantial $10 billion settlement in a mass tort lawsuit has been announced by the AFFF manufacturer. This development signals a potential turning point in the ongoing legal saga surrounding PFAS litigation and AFFF lawsuits.

Moving Forward: Regulation and Awareness

Regulatory agencies like the EPA have taken steps to address PFAS concerns, but challenges remain in managing existing stocks of AFFF containing these chemicals. Heightened awareness is crucial to protect firefighters, military personnel, and the public from the health risks associated with AFFF exposure. 

As per the EPA, stricter regulations, improved firefighting technologies, and safer alternatives are necessary to mitigate the long-term impacts of AFFF. Collaborative efforts are needed to ensure that firefighting practices prioritize both effectiveness and safety.

Final Thoughts

Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) has been an essential firefighting tool. However, concerns about its potential health risks, particularly due to the inclusion of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), cannot be overlooked. 

The revelation of PFAS toxicity has triggered litigation and public outcry, emphasizing the urgency of accountability and safer firefighting practices. The recent substantial settlement by a major manufacturer signifies a significant step toward addressing this issue. 

Moving forward, a comprehensive approach involving stricter regulations, heightened awareness, and the development of safer alternatives is crucial. This is to safeguard both firefighters and the general public from the potential long-term health impacts of AFFF exposure.